Restricting calories may improve outcomes for women with triple-negative breast cancer, according to a study published May 26th in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.  Research showed that TNBC was less likely to metastasize in mice that were fed a restricted diet.
When mouse models of triple negative cancer were fed 30 percent less than what they ate when given free access to food, the cancer cells decreased their production of microRNAs 17 and 20 (miR 17/20). Researchers have found that this group of miRs is often increased in triple negative cancers that metastasize.
Breast cancer patients are often treated with hormonal therapy to block tumor growth, and steroids to counteract the side effects of chemotherapy. However, both treatments can cause a patient to have altered metabolism, which can lead to weight gain. In fact, women gain an average of 10 pounds in their first year of treatment. Recent studies have shown that too much weight makes standard treatments for breast cancer less effective, and those who gain weight during treatment have worse cancer outcomes. 
“That’s why it’s important to look at metabolism when treating women with cancer,” says says senior author Nicole Simone, M.D., an associate professor in the department of Radiation Oncology at Thomas Jefferson University.
In earlier studies, Simone and colleagues had shown that calorie restriction boosted the tumor-killing effects of radiation therapy. This study examined which molecular pathways were involved in this cooperative effect.
The investigators noticed that microRNAs – a type of RNA that regulates other genes in the cell – specifically miR 17 and 20, decreased the most when mice were treated with both radiation and calorie restriction. This decrease in turn increased the production of proteins involved in maintaining the extracellular matrix. 

“A strong matrix creates a sort of cage around the tumor, making it more difficult for cancer cells to escape and spread to new sites in the body,” Simone says.

Understanding the link to miR 17 also gives researchers a molecular target for diagnosing cancers that are more likely to metastasize and, potentially, for developing a new drug to treat the cancers. In theory, a drug that decreased miR 17 could have the same effect on the extracellular matrix as calorie restriction. However, targeting a single molecular pathway, such as the miR17, is unlikely to be as effective as calorie restriction, Simone says. Triple negative breast cancers tend to be quite different genetically from patient to patient. If calorie restriction is as effective in women as it is in animal models, then it would likely change the expression patterns of a large set of genes, hitting multiple targets at once without toxicity.
In order to test that this hypothesis is true in humans, Simone is enrolling patients in the CaReFOR (Calorie Restriction for Oncology Research) trial. As the first trial like it in the country, women undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer receive nutritional counseling and are guided through their weight loss plan as they undergo their treatment for breast cancer.
From a news release from Thomas Jefferson University.
Please donate to Positives About Negative if you would like to keep this site going.  This work is entirely supported by readers.   You’re all there is.  Just click on the Donate button in the right of the page.  Thank you!

2 thoughts on “Cutting calories may cut risk of metastasis in TNBC

  1. Anonymous says:

    Not that I know of, Audrey. I'll publish whatever is out there, if I find it. Hugs. Pat

  2. Anonymous says:

    Are there any studies regarding TNBC and the use of TNF Blockers?

Leave a Reply